Photo by me. |
PROBLEMS
- Wrong information. What I found in my research from the annotated bibliography assignment ended up being a lot of post-1700 information—e.g. designing type, use of type on the web, the type work of modern designers—which is what interested me! But it meant that I didn’t have a lot to go on when choosing what to write about. (We’ve already found that it would have been really helpful to know that we would be writing a research paper when we did the annotated bibliography assignment.)
- Limited information. My initial topic was insanely interesting to me—literacy as the beneficial effect of society influence on the development of typography. I had a couple of good examples (e.g. because the first type looked hand-written [Gutenberg], people were more open to printed materials), but not enough to go on, really.
- Limited time. The weekend after the assignment was given, it was my birthday, I had four (FOUR!) performances with BYU performing groups, and my parents were in town. My time was limited.
SOLUTIONS
- More research. I did more research online. It became more and more obvious that the Classical revival had a huge influence on the early development of Latin type. This became my new topic.
- Simplicity. What I found doing more research was so much simpler than my previous topic. This felt really good.
- Right information. I found that some of the research I had done for my annotated bibliography fit perfectly for this topic! I was also able to use information from Royal Skousen’s lecture.
- Previous knowledge. I had already studied part of my topic (Classicism) in another class. This made me more comfortable with my topic, and able to contribute my own knowledge to this new field.
No comments:
Post a Comment